venomous porridge: Common Misconceptions about What I Wrote Yesterday
Via venomous porridge
In a probably-futile attempt to stem the tide of redundant comments, I’ll address some of the more frequent reactions to my last post:
If you don’t like it, don’t use it! Duh.
You’re missing the point. The issue is that this is a software EULA which for the first time attempts to restrict…
32 notes
Posted on Saturday January 21st
-
eoinpurcell liked this
-
eoinpurcell reblogged this from dwineman
-
irreverend liked this
-
mattgriffin liked this
-
macsnippets reblogged this from dwineman and added:
Die Lizenzbedingungen von...Author(*) gehen manchen zu weit,
-
tonyhogman liked this
-
smartasshat liked this
-
himysyed reblogged this from dwineman
-
himysyed liked this
-
amkelly liked this
-
g3niu5 liked this
-
g3niu5 reblogged this from dwineman
-
xntrek liked this
-
joeks said:
Yes, I would like EULAs to be able to say anything. People who make software should be able to dictate the terms of the use of their software, and anyone who doesn’t like the agreement should be able to use something else.
-
samhey said:
I love you.
-
samhey liked this
-
toolateadopter liked this
-
haseman liked this
-
megannaise liked this
-
This was featured in #Tech
-
nicky36 liked this
-
langer said:
Such great stuff. Keep it up!!
-
langer liked this
-
steelopus liked this
-
lefauxfrog liked this
-
mbimotmog liked this
-
do-over liked this
-
rsmallbone liked this
-
rsmallbone said:
Regardless of whether EULAs in general can be enforced, I wonder whether Apple has any right to tell you where and how you can sell your own copyrighted work. Even using the iBooks format, I would imagine that your copyright would trump their EULA.
-
sistacrumpet liked this
-
everythinginthesky liked this
-
3hoss liked this
-
ronbailey liked this
-
dwineman posted this